bottom, buffy fandom
I Blame the Dutch mpoetess
Previous Entry Share Flag Next Entry
Weeble? Buffy - "Lies My Parents Told Me"




Stuff:

Anya's hat! Quick, someone get that thing off her head. Can't you see it's eating her brain? And a subdued heh on the subject of "Forgiveness is human, blah blah blah" -- though having it be fratboys that she refers to Spike killing was a bit stagey, for a joke with that sort of too little too late punchline.

William's hair: bad, bad, bad. Actually, if I try to look at him as post-turning Spike? It's kind of hot. But as William? Please shoot the wig dept. Plus his hair is somehow darker now?

Also, his voice is lower, he's less nervous, and he has stubble. William? Would never have stubble. It's hot, I just... Oh, I said that already. I can actually buy that he would be less nervous and sissified around his mother, than out in public -- but it still came off as too much Spike.

Nice to see Dru back being Dru. I can't really say whether she's more "real Dru" than the First was, whether Juliet Landau was off form as First!Dru or it was done on purpose. All I can say is that I liked Dru as seen here. And how hot was baby!Spike getting it on with Dru in his mum's parlor? Wibble.

Spike's mum is great (oh, and Cecily finally has a last name: Underwood. Pah; I was holding out for Fairfax) and I think the storyline and what Spike needed to learn from it worked out for me exactly as it was supposed to. Ricean friends are undoubtedly going to have things to say about the Vampire Lestat parallels; I've read the book, but not in obssessive fannish detail -- my opinion is that of girl on the street, I guess. I see the lift/parallel, but I think it was used to its own purposes here: Stat *did* want to spend forever as his mummy's lover, I think, and she didn't mind the idea, at least for a while. Spike's mum didn't want him around once she changed -- either that, or the part of her that was still *her* pushed him to kill her and free her from what he'd turned her into. Either way, the lesson is different from Lestat's, and supports the conclusion Spike comes to -- that his mother did love him more than anything else. and that a Slayer never will.

I was intrigued by his answer for Wood -- that the Slayer is all about the Mission, and, esentially, Nikki knew what she was getting into, and she's the one who left him an orphan. But here's where we get into my need for a "confuzzled" mood (Yeah, they have it at Journalfen, but I want it heeeeeeere).

So:

Wood had his reasons, which were about as straightforward as possible. Giles' reasons, though (if we're to believe this is Giles and we're not still being played for some sort of "Look, he's not touching anything -- psych!" fool) are allegedly all about... the Mission. Even though I've not been happy with Giles-if-he's-really-Giles so far this season, I can buy his Be a General speech. I can accept that his motivations are pure simply because Giles doesn't have any other potential motivations to want to hurt Spike. So, Spike has to be taken out, for their safety, to save the world.

Buffy? She says she'd let Dawn die, if she had it to do over again. This show hasn't shown me any kind of change in Buffy's worldview that supports such a statement, since the end of Season 5, but, um, ok. The fanwankiest I can get on that subject is that now she knows there's a heaven, so dying isn't the be-all-end-all for humans. Let's go with it, though. Let's say Buffy would let Dawn die. Let's say she understands about being a General. Let's say she's legitimately mad at Wood not because he tried to kill someone she has disturbingly complex feelings for, but simply because they need Spike, and Wood was letting his vendetta be more important than... the Mission.

In that case, why is Buffy mad at Giles? So quietly, bitterly mad at Giles.

Best guesses -- a) he's right in spirit, though wrong in tactics, and she hates him for his part in turning her into someone who could be All About the Mission. b) he's right in spirit, but he undercut her; he didn't let her make the tactical decisions. I could see that as a legit reason to be angry with him, but that doesn't really seem to fit with "I think I've learned everything I need to from you." She's bitter there. c) he's wrong in spirit -- because Buffy has some internal definition of the Mission that we haven't seen her hash out, that basically says "We kill potentially good people only as a last resort, and this isn't one and you should've known that." d) ? Buffy's a hypocrite, as are they all, which we all knew?

Overall, me likee. I'm just confuzzled as to what I was supposed to take away, regarding Buffy's position at the end of the episode, and Giles'.


ladycat777

2003-03-25 08:18 pm (UTC) (Link)

To add to what a lot of people have said. . . I think Buffy's main problem is, well, it's been seven years. Seven years of Giles saying one thing and Buffy being right. Seven years of Giles saying lead with your head and Buffy usually leading with her heart. Yeah, I don't get the Dawn thing - that was new and different and needed to be explored better - but everything else, I think she's just fed up. Giles, this season, has basically waltzed back into her life time and again and dumped problems on her. Last season, he saved the day - go him. This season? We've got the multitude of potentials, the 'don't trust spike' speeches, and more importantly the 'don't have fun, do your work speeches'. Buffy has *always* been about have fun with the Slaying because if you don't, what the hell is it for?

So I think she's fed up. No more lessons she already knows the answers to, no more games she refuses to play and has plans to work around. She wants a Giles that will help her, not constantly undercut her when frankly, he has *no* idea of the integral workings anymore. Both he and Wood are essentially outsiders. If Giles were still an insider, he wouldn't have done this - either because it would have come up earlier, or he would understand that Buffy really does trust Spike. Either way, this is just underscoring that fact. Giles is no longer a part of the Scoobies.

Now, I hope like hell there's a point to this, because otherwise it is like the forgot how to write Giles in three months or less. Which is stupid and where did all the writers we used to love and trust go? Because Giles is such an important character, to screw with him *this* badly leaves me either annoyed or anticipatory. I'm praying for anticipatory.

But yeah, to get back to my oh-so-rambling point - this was Buffy saying either get with me or get away from me. Basically the same thing she told Wood, only much worse. . . because he is her father.

mpoetess

2003-03-26 06:02 am (UTC) (Link)

Yeah, I agree with all of that.

I'm just not sure that cold, dismissive "I've learned everything I can from you" really portrays fed up, or even "get with me or get away" -- it seems like she's made up her mind, and won't forgive him. I hope that's not the case, because at *some* point I want Buffy-Giles loving goodness, dammit! (In a non-shippery way, though I've never been opposed to the shippery version.)