bottom, buffy fandom
I Blame the Dutch mpoetess
Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Asshat!
I have not yet managed to actually get into a flamewar with this creature, though she slipped fairly close to the line a few times. Especially with the Clex and Qui/Obi dogsex suggestion. Eww.

For background on who Asshat is, go here.

For this morning's scarily zenlike encounter with the Asshat, go here:

Conversations With Asshat!

I think I'm most amused that both Asshat and Bitchy automatically assume the person talking to them is Kita.
__

Asshat is online (as it were) and will take questions/comments from callers and/or trolls, should anyone desire to offer them.

ladycat777

2003-09-05 08:16 am (UTC) (Link)

*snickers*

virtual_asshat

2003-09-05 09:17 am (UTC) (Link)

It's all about possibilities and moving on and snickers as flames leap higher.

ladycat777

2003-09-05 09:20 am (UTC) (Link)

*snickers turn into outright guffaws*

virtual_asshat

2003-09-05 09:21 am (UTC) (Link)

If you have not and will probably turn into outright guffaws.


jslayeruk

2003-09-05 08:20 am (UTC) (Link)

"Angelus is *not* fanfic assboy to Justin Timberlake."

Not yet anyway... *smiles evilly*

virtual_asshat

2003-09-05 09:19 am (UTC) (Link)

"Angelus is *not* fanfic assboy to Justin Timberlake."


And the justin timberlake on the slash culture i might rant at them. Depends what they think something, that it has to do a "what is slash?" essay for a while and have a tendency to write fanfic.

Not yet anyway... *smiles evilly*

What are they fine because they've got smiles like that.

hoegh

2003-09-05 09:01 am (UTC) (Link)

I'm most impressed! How on earth did you make sense out of that mish mash?!? If it wasn't for your comments, I'd never have any idea what this was about

virtual_asshat

2003-09-05 09:11 am (UTC) (Link)

I wasn't saying that there's been a rise in the idea of slash as bad as holocaust denial.

*can't... breathe...

kuzibah

2003-09-05 09:13 am (UTC) (Link)

*gasp*

Re: *can't... breathe...

virtual_asshat

2003-09-05 09:15 am (UTC) (Link)

Biology correspondence in function or position between organs of
dissimilar evolutionary origin or structure.

mpoetess

2003-09-05 09:13 am (UTC) (Link)

Hee. (The above being Asshat's reply to your question.)

Just by doing what people who interact with wanna-be Artificial Intelligence programs do all the time -- looking for meaning in semi-random combinations of words. It can get scary, when coincidence leads you to wonder if you've actually found some.

I think I've been on Con Panels with Asshat

kuzibah

2003-09-05 09:11 am (UTC) (Link)

Also- LMAO.

Re: I think I've been on Con Panels with Asshat

virtual_asshat

2003-09-05 09:16 am (UTC) (Link)

I also think it's very interesting getting a male, especially straight male, viewpoint, and i mean every fandom has slash writers, or slash writers who've been calling people who also feel that you stop making shit up and in short makes me laugh.

minitrog

2003-09-05 09:30 am (UTC) (Link)

I'm squeaking like a girly meta-puppy coz Asshat quoted me! It surely must be Friday...

virtual_asshat

2003-09-05 09:43 am (UTC) (Link)

I have just bitched to you by the meta about why someone writes works that i am neither an author whose work is saying xyz must be friday...

minitrog

2003-09-05 09:50 am (UTC) (Link)

Tee hee. I *knew* that!

miggy

2003-09-05 09:52 am (UTC) (Link)

Can we hear from Asshat on whether Queer Eye is exploitative or not?

virtual_asshat

2003-09-05 10:28 am (UTC) (Link)

Direct reply to your question:

And also, on more than in the eye of the time, and if it is exploitative.

Reply to more structured question: Do you feel that Queer Eye for the Straight Guy is exploitative of gay men or gay culture?

You're assuming a culture in the eye of the man focused on author intent, up to and posted above, and if other slash ficers share that view, then it is exploitative.

What if we're not focused on author intent. Is Queer Eye still exploitative then?

Fallacy of authorial intent of the man would do things they never did in the eye of the author, and that says otherwise is wrong.

miggy

2003-09-05 10:31 am (UTC) (Link)

This is all fascinating. I can clearly see that slash writers are one step away from descending into minstrel shows in text.

virtual_asshat

2003-09-05 10:39 am (UTC) (Link)

You think slash is all fascinating. I can clearly see that flaming green demon who sings gloria gaynor and wears flashy clothing? (I know playing on stereotypes.) but andy hallet's impression of lorne's sexuality is "the host is just me, i agree.

mishamcm

2003-09-05 10:03 am (UTC) (Link)

"what do straight, bi and queer women like about two men in a non-sequitur.
Now that's a good question.

the sexual preference remains the schrodinger's cat in the history of the structure of the mouth.
Asshat is a brilliant philosopher, don't you think?

virtual_asshat

2003-09-05 10:30 am (UTC) (Link)

Asshat is a brilliant philosopher, don't you think?


I have no authority because apparently anyone who doesn't get her well and it makes me think that you use the word 'asshat'.

dick? bah.

lilithchilde

2003-09-06 10:22 pm (UTC) (Link)

Hmmm. You know, I'm getting sick of hearing about so and so needing "dick" (fandom, fangirls, or whoever). True, I'm a slash fan, but honestly, I think it's about time everyone got some pussy. Myself included.

Above all, I think Asshat should definately get some pussy. Asshat needs some pussy.

Pussy for everyone!

(How's that for some new vocabulary? ;) And, you're brilliant, by the way. In case you didn't already know.)

Re: dick? bah.

mpoetess

2003-09-08 06:47 am (UTC) (Link)

Ah, the joy of not getting commenst because my e-mail still isn't up to speed.

I agree. Asshat needs pussy. Or possibly a cat.

I'd feed your comment to Asshat and offer a folded/spindled/mutilated reply, but alas Asshat is at home, and I am.... not.

Re: dick? bah.

lilithchilde

2003-09-08 04:54 pm (UTC) (Link)

*laughs* Cats are good as well, if pussy isn't available. Wait, I didn't mean it like that. Aack. =P

Awww, that's a shame.